World Cup 2026  /  Composite Ratings
Six sources, one index

Composite ratings & predictions

Our model is one opinion. This page blends it with five independent ones — Elo ratings, Pelé ratings, FIFA ranking points, betting-market title odds, and the Opta supercomputer — into a single composite index, scaled so the top team sits at 100. Where the columns agree, the signal is strong; where they split, that’s where tournaments get interesting.

All 48 teams

The composite board

Every column is scaled 0–100 within its source. Click a column to sort by it.

TeamCompositeOur modelEloPeléFIFAMarketOpta
1Spain100.0100.0100.0100.099.8100.0100.0
2Argentina94.589.894.397.299.690.296.1
3France94.192.687.287.9100.098.698.2
4England89.482.981.989.891.493.996.8
5Portugal83.679.177.279.081.092.093.2
6Brazil82.770.777.485.080.590.292.6
7Germany79.476.869.479.675.383.691.7
8Netherlands77.975.171.674.579.978.188.2
9Colombia71.760.076.274.969.167.283.1
10Belgium70.461.364.366.876.170.284.0
11Norway66.556.267.073.245.270.287.3
12Croatia66.461.666.760.573.156.080.4
13Uruguay66.358.064.069.965.759.181.3
14Morocco66.255.655.257.579.867.282.0
15Switzerland64.054.563.963.661.759.181.2
16Turkey63.960.266.666.553.359.177.7
17Japan63.850.865.960.763.663.678.3
18Senegal63.152.359.662.968.959.175.5
19Ecuador62.746.670.270.752.656.080.1
20Mexico61.848.561.758.167.159.176.2
21United States57.043.841.448.465.763.679.1
22Austria54.247.255.653.752.445.970.7
23Canada50.237.549.949.646.145.972.0
24Paraguay49.235.456.157.337.337.671.4
25Algeria47.743.247.746.847.537.663.4
26Sweden47.438.339.545.239.152.469.6
27South Korea46.535.745.840.051.537.668.6
28Iran46.547.747.734.656.026.366.5
29Scotland46.137.949.049.936.437.665.6
30Egypt44.233.837.440.147.337.669.2
31Ivory Coast43.936.437.243.442.241.263.0
32Czech Republic43.836.143.342.939.037.664.2
33Australia42.825.348.440.950.226.365.6
34Panama39.241.742.035.743.515.057.7
35Uzbekistan35.040.239.829.931.515.053.4
36DR Congo33.129.931.434.633.219.750.0
37Tunisia33.024.128.126.833.826.359.2
38Bosnia and Herzegovina31.513.523.629.019.637.665.9
39Jordan28.931.135.220.018.415.053.4
40Iraq26.823.725.319.227.815.050.0
41Ghana25.517.612.123.410.926.363.0
42South Africa23.710.613.023.124.915.055.8
43Saudi Arabia23.112.021.117.123.515.050.0
44New Zealand19.211.319.216.50.015.053.4
45Cape Verde18.88.821.314.415.015.038.4
46Qatar16.83.00.00.029.115.053.4
47Haiti7.511.417.314.51.70.00.0
48Curaçao1.30.01.83.92.20.00.0
Round by round

How far does everyone go?

Our model only →

Composite probability (%) of reaching each stage — our simulation and Opta’s averaged, with the betting market folded into the title column.

TeamR32R16QFSFFinalTitle
1Spain>997657453018
2France967553382415
3England966948311810
4Argentina976448332010.0
5Portugal94644226158.1
6Brazil96613821116.3
7Germany98683623125.9
8Netherlands915335189.14.2
9Norway804725135.72.4
10Belgium915831125.52.3
11Colombia834422104.51.8
12Morocco8744239.74.01.7
13Uruguay8840219.84.11.4
14Croatia804321104.31.4
15Switzerland9255249.53.51.2
16United States8046217.83.01.2
17Japan7835187.63.01.2
18Turkey8348238.73.21.1
19Mexico9054238.12.8<1
20Ecuador8439156.32.5<1
21Senegal6431145.51.9<1
22Canada8546185.31.7<1
23Austria67239.53.71.3<1
24Sweden61207.92.7<1<1
25Paraguay62279.23.0<1<1
26Iran7636134.01.1<1
27Egypt67289.02.5<1<1
28South Korea7233112.9<1<1
29Scotland64227.82.4<1<1
30Ivory Coast67247.32.1<1<1
31Czech Republic68309.62.3<1<1
32Algeria59187.02.4<1<1
33Bosnia and Herzegovina57206.51.7<1<1
34Australia48195.91.8<1<1
35Ghana38123.71.3<1<1
36Panama51175.71.8<1<1
37Uzbekistan48155.01.5<1<1
38Tunisia4010.03.2<1<1<1
39DR Congo41113.4<1<1<1
40Jordan41113.3<1<1<1
41South Africa42133.6<1<1<1
42New Zealand37112.6<1<1<1
43Qatar349.62.4<1<1<1
44Iraq267.92.2<1<1<1
45Saudi Arabia348.12.1<1<1<1
46Cape Verde316.91.6<1<1<1
47Curaçao173.1<1<1<1<1
48Haiti213.6<1<1<1<1
Model vs. market

Where we disagree with Vegas

Title odds where our model and the betting market split the most, in percentage points. When the tournament ends, this list is the model’s report card.

Model higher than market

Spainus 23% · mkt 15%+8.1
Franceus 17% · mkt 14%+3.6
Argentinaus 12% · mkt 8.2%+3.5

Market higher than model

Brazilus 4.2% · mkt 8.2%-4.0
Norwayus 1.2% · mkt 2.4%-1.2
Englandus 9.1% · mkt 10%-1.2
Portugalus 8.1% · mkt 9.1%-1.1
Group stage

Matches where we split with the market

All matches →

Group games where our model’s most likely result differs from the betting market’s favorite.

GHA v PANWed, Jun 17us: away win 51% · market: home win 46%
EGY v IRNFri, Jun 26us: away win 44% · market: home win 42%
COD v UZBSat, Jun 27us: away win 42% · market: home win 41%
TUR v USAThu, Jun 25us: home win 46% · market: away win 38%
CPV v KSAFri, Jun 26us: away win 37% · market: home win 37%
KOR v CZEThu, Jun 11us: away win 35% · market: home win 36%
Methodology

How the composite works

Each source is normalized to a 0–100 scale (best team = 100) and the composite index is their average: our team-strength model, World Football Elo, Pelé ratings, FIFA ranking points, title odds implied by the betting market, and Opta’s supercomputer. Round-by-round probabilities average our tournament simulation with Opta’s published numbers; match probabilities additionally fold in sportsbook and prediction-market prices, with the source count shown on each match page. None of it is betting advice — it’s a transparent look at how six independent systems see the same tournament.